Skip to main content

Say no to el Cheapo

I have been think over some of the material that I learned in the Presentation Zen workshop with Garr Reynolds at WebStock the other day. One thought, probably quite random keeps bobbing up to the surface which is a realisation of a problem that I have been contemplating for years.

"Be very expensive, or free. But never cheap."

A number of times I have allowed myself to be whittled down on price because I kind of felt sorry for a client, or because there were a friend or colleague whom I wanted to help out. The 'mates rate' never turns out to be a good idea. Things take time whether they are expensive, cheap or free. But by allowing the project to err into the cheap zone you go with it into a bad psychological place that can lead to problems.

The cheap client has a moral position over you. Having agreed to buy your services at a reduced rate the price is irrelevant - your obligation is the same. A small amount of money might be perceived by the client as a great deal of cash - it might be all they have and so their expectation is elevated, possibly to higher level than for a client who is not betting the farm.

In my experience el cheapo clients tend to behave the worst. They often demand more from you than first class, full fare paying passengers. Like holiday makers on a budget they want their full allocation of complimentary drinks, and will doggedly stay awake on a trans-continental flight to make sure they don't miss out on any in-flight service.

If there is a project you want to do, but the client doesn't have the cash to pay your rate-card fee, and you want to do the job do it for free. Come to it from a generous place - don't be the mirror image of the cheapskate and demand more of the client because they are enjoying your beneficence. Do your usual great job and do your best work. Why would you offer anything less whatever the price? (after the money is spent you still have to live with your work). As a measure - if you can't afford the time and resources to do it free, and it will never be a job you can be proud of - don't do it at all. Having dud projects orbited by the satellites of passive aggressive reasons why it could have great - if wasn't for a) lack of budget b) cheapskate clients c) any other feeble excuse you can think of - will affect your ability to shine your brilliance on the plum jobs that keep you in the luxury you have become accustomed to.

My suggestion is that you budget a certain number of pro-bono projects each year and stick to it. Or learn to say no. Life is less complex that way

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Go figure

Took my daughter shopping tonight. We had dinner out. Got back home late. She laid her new clothes out in neat rows so she could choose what to wear for tomorrow. She's 5. I see her just every second weekend. How can such incredible errors of judgement (marrying my daughter's mother) result in such a wonderful little human being? Go figure

Mac Air Music

I love the idea of the Mac Air but, call me old fashioned, …no disk drive? How will I watch Ratatouille, Toy Story, The Incredibles, Finding Nemo, Cars and A Bug's Life on DVD? The music on the MacAir launch commercial is terrific. I tracked the artiste Yael Naim's video for you. What is the name for this genre (Regina Spectre et al)? Apparently Steve Jobs chose the track personally for the TVC. Order from Amazon: Splash out:

Sexist Advertising and stereotypes

Advertising lives in the short-form world. Because mass media is so expensive the 30 second commercial is conventional and because there is so much clutter simplified signals are essential to 'cut through'. One form of communication short-hand used as a default is the stereotype - "A stereotype can be a conventional and oversimplified conception, opinion, or image, based on the assumption that there are attributes that members of the "other group" have in common. Stereotypes are sometimes formed by a previous illusory correlation, a false association between two variables that are loosely correlated if correlated at all. Though generally viewed as negative perceptions, stereotypes may be either positive or negative in tone." In the 1950's and 60's when men dominated advertising stereotypical impressions of women as inferior or subservient were not only commonplace but usual. It was normal to show women as housekeepers, largely because most wer...