Skip to main content

Is Unilever messing with your head?

Unilever were behind the Dove campaign for real beauty ads which generated a lot of discussion on the blogosphere; some positive - but not all.
The most recent twist in the tale were accusations that the 'natural' women who stripped down to their skivvies had been heavily retouched in the photos.

The campaign has been a resounding success for the brand, nonetheless. Consumers are used to being duped. It is part of the transaction between us and marketers. The loss of innocence happened a long time ago. In fact, I would go as far as to say that we expect to be fooled by advertising. We want to live the lie.

If I were to buy a pair of Emporio Armani I am fantasizing that there is some association between me and David Beckham. The B roll in my mind's eye shows me as irresistible to women - lean and muscular. Sadly has nothing to do with the more mundane truth that nothing could be further from any kind of hard, objective reality. It isn't even an aspirational truth - that I could be something like Beckham - even Armani can't defy genetics. So I calculate, in the blink of an eye, that the Emporio Armani underwear brand is not for me.

But back to our friends at Unilever. The marketer has trained their big guns squarely on women. I can only imagine the kind of money they spend on market research to probe the inner workings of the minds of their customers and prospects (probably as much as Beckham was paid by Armani to loll about in his daks). In the new campaign for their brand Suave in the US the results of the research has plainly made it to the screen.



In their commercials for Suave hair care products young mothers are shown being made over with Suave products. Research finding #1: the hair is the first to go when you have kids. There is just no time. Finding #2 a hair do will make a woman feel renewed and give her sense of self (including sexuality) a boost - no need for fancy clothes.

Solution: Be a cheerleader for the time honored institution of motherhood. Promise that great looking hair (and therefor a renewal of your sense of self - no need to be solely the giving goddess whose family suck the life blood out from them).

The ads are genius in their simplicity. Maybe a little fanciful in their casting and literal in their portrayal of the endless focus groups - which I am certain they commissioned - but full of warm, simple charm. They are likable and, unlike Becks' Armani advertising, achievable.

The web is cleverly used to take the message to the next step - showing the transformation of our harried mothers into practically elegant women who are also mothers - with the help of Suave products (oh, and hair stylist Luke O'Connell - a small detail they forget to mention in the ads).

I like the tone and delivery. Unilever have staked out the territory pretty well - with simple, direct messages that don't promise unattainable glamor but unleash the 'yummy mummy' within. 89% of moms say they've let themselves go - 100% can get themselves back. Say yes to beautiful"

Meanwhile their Lynx/Axe campaign promises young men the world over that they will be irresistible to women.

There are some lies we simply need to tell ourselves. Who can say no to beautiful?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Johnny Bunko competiton

The Great Johnny Bunko Challenge from DHP on Vimeo . There's a young chap in Indiana, one Alec Quig , who has written to me about creating a career based on a polymathic degree, from which he has recently graduated. He's an interesting young man and his concerns about going forward in life are the anxieties we all face at crossroads in our lives when we are forced to make choices. Dan Pink's latest book The Adventures of Johnny Bunko: The Last Career Guide You'll Ever Need might help: "From a New York Times, BusinessWeek, and Washington Post bestselling author comes a first-of-its- kind career guide for a new generation of job seekers.There's never been a career guide like it.the fully illustrated story (ingeniously told in Manga form) of a young Everyman just out of college who lands his first job. Johnny Bunko is new to parachute company Boggs Corp., and he stumbles through his early days as a working stiff until a crisis prompts him to find a new job. St

Ze Frank thinks so you don't have to

Ze Frank appeared on my radar when I saw his presentation among the excellent TED Talks videos . This morning I was reading Russell Davies planning blog in which he referred to a clip by Ze Frank - Where do ideas come from. Here's the transcript: "...Hungry Hippo licks Aunt JEmima [sic] writes, "Are you ever gonna break into song again? Are you running out of ideas?" Hungry Hippo licks Aunt JEmima, that's a good question. I run out of ideas every day! Each day I live in mortal fear that I've used up the last idea that'll ever come to me. If you don't wanna run out of ideas the best thing to do is not to execute them. You can tell yourself that you don't have the time or resources to do 'em right. Then they stay around in your head like brain crack. No matter how bad things get, at least you have those good ideas that you'll get to later. Some people get addicted to that brain crack. And the longer they wait, the more they convince themse

Sexist Advertising and stereotypes

Advertising lives in the short-form world. Because mass media is so expensive the 30 second commercial is conventional and because there is so much clutter simplified signals are essential to 'cut through'. One form of communication short-hand used as a default is the stereotype - "A stereotype can be a conventional and oversimplified conception, opinion, or image, based on the assumption that there are attributes that members of the "other group" have in common. Stereotypes are sometimes formed by a previous illusory correlation, a false association between two variables that are loosely correlated if correlated at all. Though generally viewed as negative perceptions, stereotypes may be either positive or negative in tone." In the 1950's and 60's when men dominated advertising stereotypical impressions of women as inferior or subservient were not only commonplace but usual. It was normal to show women as housekeepers, largely because most wer