There has been a furor. The popular TradeMe auction site has banned some painters from listing their works on the site. Their reasoning: the paintings are not the artist’s own work. They, it has been argued, breach the copyright of a photographer. This raises an interesting question about the nature of copyright and what constitutes art. There are other issues relating to trade descriptions of the work, but for the purpose of this discussion I will set that aside. Here's the bully: Painter sources an image published on the internet he models an oil painting on the photo, making little or no alteration to the composition of the image. At first glance you might think the images were the same. But only at first glance. One, you see, is a record of a landscape created using a scientific instrument and some chemical processes. The other is a painting. There is little artistry in the work that is, in fact, the photographer's own. He has made a record of a scene. One might argue that
It's like you got yesterday, today and tomorrow, all in the same room. There's no telling what can happen.